This week I have been working a lot on the importance of
foot work to Aiki. Now I practice Dentokan Aiki Jujutsu, which as I have
explained before is based on the Hakko Ryu system of Aiki Jujutsu in Japan.
Ours is an Aiki art but it is also very much a Jujutsu art as well. I was
fortunate to work one-to-one with one of my instructors this week and we focussed,
amongst other things, on the importance of foot work in applying Aiki. It can
be generally argued as Dentokan Aiki Jujutsu is a Jutsu art that it would fall
under the category of Japanese Bujutsu, meaning art or science of war. Generally
speaking these arts place less emphasis on the ‘philosophy’ of the art, and
focus more on the effectiveness of the techniques in combat. On a very
simplistic level it could be said that Aiki-Jujutsu is Aikido without the
philosophical connotations. Does then that change the nature of our use of Aiki
as compared to Aikido? I have always understood Aiki to simply be the
application of off-balancing your opponent as they attack. Indeed this is
precisely the use of Aiki as found in Daito-Ryu Aiki Jujutsu, the predecessor
to both Hakko Ryu Jujutsu and Aikido and a true Koryu (ancient art) of Japan.
In Daito-Ryu Aiki Jujutsu Aiki is the off-balancing of your
attacker as they enter for an attack. Examples given included Tachiai Ippondori
and Shihonage. Both of these techniques have their equivalents in Dentokan Aiki
Jujutsu. Here Tachiai Ippondori relates to Uchi Komi Dori and Shihonage is the
same. Let’s take Tachiai Ippondori (Uchi Komi Dori) – here the uke (attacker)
raises their arm in an overhead strike, simulating a sword cut. At the moment
the uke raises their arms over their head the tori makes the block with two
straight arms before the uke has a chance to strike, thus breaking their
posture. It is an extremely simple principle but it makes an enormous amount of
difference compared to the straight forward Jujutsu version where the block is
executed after the uke has made the strike. In the Jujutsu version the attacker
is on posture when the technique is executed and is therefore much stronger. In
the example of Shihonage the uke grabs the tori’s wrist with the intention of
preventing them from drawing their sword. Here the tori leads the uke off-balance
at the point of entry - the tori moves their hand back just as the uke is
coming to grab making them over extend their reach just slightly, breaking
their balance. Rather than the uke being static and contact being made before
the technique is executed, in Aiki Jujutsu the hand is drawn back just before
contact thus making the uke over extend their reach breaking their balance.
In both of these examples there is no mystical energy force
being summoned just extremely precise reactions designed to break the person’s
balance at the moment of attack. Once a person’s balance is taken their
strength is negated. This does relate to energy, insofar as it is blending to a
degree with the attacker’s energy, but blending is an expression of yielding
the very principle at the heart of Jujutsu. Therefore Aiki is a natural
extension of Jujutsu. From my experience of Dentokan Aiki Jujutsu and my study
of Aiki as practised in Daito-Ryu Aiki Jujutsu, Aiki is a science, the science
of taking posture in correlation to the successful execution of Jujutsu
techniques. In this respect techniques using Aiki have the potential to be very
powerful and effective and far more likely to be successful. However,
developing the sharpness of perception and precision reaction times in order to
off-balance your attacker at the moment of attack takes many, many hours of
practice. This is the irony of the criticisms levelled at Aiki arts for being
unrealistic for self-defence. It may require years of training but once you are
able to off-balance your opponent at the moment of attack the likelihood of
successfully defending yourself dramatically increases.
No comments:
Post a Comment